Provide an opposing argument to the below article from my course mate

It is sad to see that six years later, many of the victims' families are still in grief.

The IRB finally heard and issued a deportation order against Sindu in May this year, without the right to appeal. It must be acknowledged that the seriousness of the crime for which Sindu was convicted has destroyed the lives and futures of many families. Even if Sindu's prospects and determination to reform are recognized by the Federal Court's ruling, it cannot cover up his crimes and prevent him from being deported for a serious crime with a sentence of more than six months' imprisonment, under the IRPA, SC 2001, c 27, s 64. Accordingly, any assessment of Sindu's circumstances cannot affect the facts that have already occurred and cannot directly apply to the IRPA. Therefore, the assessment of Sindu's circumstances should not be a factor in making a deportation decision.

On the other hand, the assessment of Sindu's circumstances is not unimportant. From the perspective of immigration workers' responsibilities to their clients, Sindu's wife still has permanent residency and their child has severe heart and lung complications. Then, after the Federal Court's decision in December 2023, he will have the opportunity to retain his permanent residency based on family ties and by submitting an H&C application in Canada, pursuant to section 25 of the IRPA. Of course, this will not affect the Federal Court's decision and the deportation order issued by the CBSA.