Puleo vs Topel Case

1. Is it possible the defendant did not know his LLC had been involuntarily dissolved because it failed to file its required annual report? Should he have known it was dissolved?

2. If Topel's business had been a corporation, he would not have had insulation from liability for post-dissolution contractshe would have been liable. Is the result here equitable? Is it fraud?

3. Seven months after the LLC's existence was terminated by the state, the defendant hired a number of employees, did not pay them, and then avoided liability under the LLC shield. How else could the court have ruled here? It is possible that the legislature's intent was simply to eliminate compulsory piercing.