Putarbelit Electric (PE) is a company selling electrical goods. Madam Good would like to buy a washing machine and she had signed a hire-purchase agreement with PE. Two (2) weeks after the agreement was signed, Madam Good had not received a opy of the hire-purchase agreement from PE. When Madam Good asked for the document of hire purchase, PE denied his duty to provide it to Madam Good within two (2) weeks. undang Five (5) months later, Madam Good retired and she received her EPF money which amounted to RM100,000. Madam Good decided to use the money to settle all her debts including the balance for the instalment of the washing machine. When Madam Good went to PE, they refused to accept the payment on the reason that early settlement by customers would cause a disadvantage to PE. Madam Good was not satisfied with PE's refusal and wanted to take legal action against PE ongn In the meantime, Mr Good, Madam Good's husband, bought a car financed by Tiger Finance (TF). The car was worth RM80,000 and the instalment was RM800 per month for nine (9) years. After using the car for eight (8) years, Mr Good was unable to settle the monthly instalment because his business had deterirated. He defaulted to pay the instalments for June and July. TF served a notice of repossession on the 1 August 2018. After receiving the notice from TF, Mr Good wanted to settle the outstanding balance for June and July instalments. He borrowed some money-from his friend and intended to make a payment to TF on 15th August 2018. Unfortunately on 14th August 2018, TF repossessed his car. Mr Good was very disappointed with TF's action and slaimed that TF did not follow the right procedure of repossession. Advise Madam Good and Mr Good based on the provisions of Hire Purchase Act 1967. (Jumlah/Total: 15 markah/marks)