Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Q1. (Behavioral Distinctions) One would hope that two agents with di'erent psychology can always be distinguished through their behavior. While they sometimes can, it is

image text in transcribed
Q1. (Behavioral Distinctions) One would hope that two agents with di'erent psychology can always be distinguished through their behavior. While they sometimes can, it is not always the case. This question explores this. (a) Suppose that an agent is offered money: she can choose any dollar amount upto $M. We see that she chooses C({o, 1, ...,M}) = {M}. Show by example that this choice can be explain equally well by (i) utility maximization with diminishing marginal utility for money, and (ii) utility max- imization with increasing marginal utility for money. (b) Consider an agent who has to choose how many donuts to eat. He exhibits the choices C({192}) : {192} and C({1929 3}) Z {293} Can these choices be explained by (i) maximization of a complete and transitive preference? (ii) satiscing? (iii) regret aversion? (c) Suppose now that the donut-eating agent exhibits the following choices: C({1,2}) = {1} and C({1,2,3}) = {2}. Can these choices be explained by (i) maximization of a complete and transitive preference? (ii) satiscing? (iii) motivated reasoning

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Sociology Of Economic Innovation

Authors: Francesco Ramella

1st Edition

1317621344, 9781317621348

More Books

Students also viewed these Economics questions