Question 1 (1 point)

Which of the following is not true?

Question 1 options:

a)	Personal jurisdiction can be waived. Subject matter jurisdiction cannot.

b)	Personal jurisdiction is the same for state and federal court. Subject matter jurisdiction requirements are not.

c)	Personal jurisdiction is required in federal courts. Subject matter jurisdiction is not.

d)	Personal jurisdiction is jurisdiction over the defendant. Subject matter jurisdiction is jurisdiction over the content of the lawsuit.

Question 2 (1 point)

Which of the following are ways that personal jurisdiction may be asserted over Dan in Nevada?

Question 2 options:

a)	Dan visits Las Vegas every year for 2 weeks.

b)	Dan is served with a complaint and summons when he visits Las Vegas for 2 weeks.

c)	Paul sues Dan in Nevada. Dan agrees to come to Las Vegas to talk to Paul about the lawsuit.

d)	Paul owns a winter home in Nevada that he visits every year to snow ski.

Question 3 (1 point)

In Milliken v. Meyer, the United States Supreme Court ruled that

Question 3 options:

a)	Domicile is a basis for exercising personal jurisdiction over the defendant in their state of domicile, even if the defendant is not currently located in the state when the plaintiff brings the claim.

b)	Domicile is not a basis for exercising personal jurisdiction over the defendant in their state of domicile, even if the defendant is not currently located in the state when the plaintiff brings the claim.

c)	Domicile is a basis for exercising personal jurisdiction over the defendant in their state of domicile, but only if the defendant is currently located in the state when the plaintiff brings the claim.

d)	Domicile is a basis for exercising personal jurisdiction over the defendant in their state of domicile, but only if the defendant is not currently located in the state when the plaintiff brings the claim.

Question 4 (1 point)

Which of the following is an example of waiving or consenting to personal jurisdiction?

Question 4 options:

a)	Agreeing in a contract to have disputes about the contract resolved in the courts of Arizona.

b)	Filing a special appearance in state court to contest personal jurisdiction.

c)	Filing a general appearance in federal court and moving to dismiss based on a lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction.

d)	All of the above.

Question 5 (1 point)

Why did personal jurisdiction exist in Burnham v. Superior Court?

Question 5 options:

a)	Because the defendant consented to personal jurisdiction when he visited his children in the forum state.

b)	Because the defendant was domiciled in the forum state.

c)	Because the defendant owned property in the forum state.

d)	Because the defendant was served with the complaint and summons while visiting his children in the forum state.