Question 1 (16 points) The State of Pennsylvania passed the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1988-1989. The law mandated that a woman seeking an abortion had to give "informed consent" at least 24 hours prior to the procedure warning her than an abortion could be detrimental to her health. The woman seeking abortion had to notify her husband about the procedure, and if the woman was a minor, she would need parental consent or seek judicial bypass instead of consent. The law also had a medical emergency definition that provided for an abortion for the woman if the pregnancy threatened her life or created a serious health risk. In the case that followed this law, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992), the court was split 5- 4 on the constitutionality of Roe v. Wade (1973) and the constitutionality of the law itself based upon the standards set forth in Roe v. Wade. The court upheld the principles established by Roe applying the doctrine of stare decisionhe case. The court also ruled that the state had a legitimate right to make laws regarding abortion as long as they did not create an "undue burden" on the woman's right to have an abortion. Thus, the court upheld the provisions of the Pennsylvania law with the exception of spousal notification. Based on this scenario, and using your knowledge of U.S. Government and Politics, answer parts A, B, and C. A. Identify the constitutional clause used by the Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) and Roe v. Wade (1973). B. Based on the constitutional issues identified in (A), explain in which ways the facts and decision of Roe v. Wade (1973) was different from the decision reached in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992). C. Describe the judicial consequences of the decision reached in Planned Parenthood v. Casey and give an example of how a special-interest group reacted to the decision