Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

QUESTION 1 [30 marks] (a) Consider the regression model that a researcher will estimate with 7' = 253 monthly observations: It = P1 + Bzxzt

image text in transcribed
QUESTION 1 [30 marks] (a) Consider the regression model that a researcher will estimate with 7' = 253 monthly observations: It = P1 + Bzxzt + Byxat + Paxar + er where y denotes changes in the UK unemployment rate from month -1 to month f, Xar are changes in the FTSE100 index level, xy; are changes in the consumer price index CPI (or inflation rate), and xat are changes in the f/euro exchange rate. List the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation assumptions and discuss: (i) the implications of violating each of them, (ii) how to detect a violation of each of them, (iii) how to remedy each of them, (iv) in your view, which of the OLS assumptions listed are more likely to be violated in the context of the above regression. (7 marks) (b) Suppose that the researcher wants to investigate the effect of the summer months (June-July- August-September) on the above relationship due to effects of tourism on unemployment. Reformulate the above regression equation in a way that allows (a) for the level of unemployment to be different in summer and non-summer months, (b) for the level of unemployment to be different in summer and non-summer months, and for the sensitivity of changes in the unemployment rate to changes in inflation to be also different in summer and non-summer month. (9 marks) (c) In the context of the model reformulated to answer question (b), how would you test the hypothesis that the unemployment is lower in the summer season? (Note: indicate clearly the null and alternative hypothesis in the context of the parameters of the reformulated model, and the test statistic and corresponding probability distribution to use). (7 marks) (d) Suppose that a researcher estimates the regression model (1) by OLS and obtains the following results: (i) the R' of the model is 78%, (ii) the p-value of the F-statistic for the overall significance of the model is 0.03%; (iii) the p-value of the individual significance -tests for each of the slopes is 0.23%, 0.64% and 0.12%, respectively. Is there any contradiction in these results? If yes, what is this contradiction likely to be stemming from? (7 marks)

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Algebra And Trigonometry Enhanced With Graphing Utilities (Subscription)

Authors: Michael, Michael Sullivan III, Michael III Sullivan, Michael Sullivan 111, III Sullivan

6th Edition

0321849132, 9780321849137

More Books

Students also viewed these Mathematics questions

Question

what is a peer Group? Importance?

Answered: 1 week ago