Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Question 10.5 pts The Model Penal Code allows the introduction of evidence regarding a defendant's mental condition to show diminished capacity when: Group of answer

Question 10.5 pts

The Model Penal Code allows the introduction of evidence regarding a defendant's mental condition to show diminished capacity when:

Group of answer choices

Evidence is never allowed for this purpose

The defendant is charged with specific intent crime only

The defendant is charged with any crime

Flag question: Question 2Question 20.5 pts

Which of the following can be introduced as evidence to show intent in a murder trial?

Group of answer choices

Defendant's statements

Premeditation

Use of a deadly weapon

All of the above

Flag question: Question 3Question 30.5 pts

Renunciation is a defense to the charge of solicitation.

Group of answer choices

True

False

Flag question: Question 4Question 40.5 pts

Which of the following is an excuse defense brought up by defendants who acted because the threats to them overcame their will?

Group of answer choices

Learned helplessness

Diminished capacity

Self-defense

Duress

Flag question: Question 5Question 50.5 pts

A ____________________ cause is likely to relieve the defendant of criminal responsibility for the social harm.

Group of answer choices

Responsive

Intervening

Superseding

Direct

Flag question: Question 6Question 60.5 pts

A defendant can claim that she abandoned her attempt to commit a crime (and thus is not criminally liable) because she decided to not commit the crime when she observed a police officer nearby.

Group of answer choices

True

False

Flag question: Question 7Question 70.5 pts

A defendant charged as a member of a conspiracy can avoid criminal liability if she can prove that she did not know all of the details of the conspiracy.

Group of answer choices

True

False

Flag question: Question 8Question 80.5 pts

Attempt is considered a(n)____________ crime.

Group of answer choices

Specific intent

Inchoate

Victimless

General intent

Flag question: Question 9Question 90.5 pts

Conspiracy is an agreement among two or more persons to commit a criminal act.

Group of answer choices

True

False

Flag question: Question 10Question 100.5 pts

If a person is found competent, the jury must:

Group of answer choices

Return a guilty verdict

Assess the evidence in light of defendant's competency

Assess the evidence

Return a not guilty verdict

Flag question: Question 11Question 110.5 pts

Intentional crimes can be broken down in ____ steps.

Group of answer choices

6

2

8

4

Flag question: Question 12Question 120.5 pts

Intervening causes cannot reduce a defendant's liability for the harms that result from the crime that she committed.

Group of answer choices

True

False

Flag question: Question 13Question 130.5 pts

Involuntary intoxication is generally a defense against both specific intent and general intent crimes.

Group of answer choices

True

False

Flag question: Question 14Question 140.5 pts

The Federal Sentencing Guidelines do not allow for a deviation from the minimum sentence due to a defendant's diminished capacity.

Group of answer choices

True

False

Flag question: Question 15Question 150.5 pts

The Model Penal Code provides that a defendant conspiring with an undercover police officer cannot be found guilty of conspiracy because the undercover police officer is not a genuine co-conspirator.

Group of answer choices

True

False

Flag question: Question 16Question 160.5 pts

The Model Penal Code recognizes three forms of criminal homicide.

Group of answer choices

True

False

Flag question: Question 17Question 170.5 pts

The apparent safety doctrine cuts off a defendant's responsibility when events have come to an apparent halt and the relevant parties are safe and secure.

Group of answer choices

True

False

Flag question: Question 18Question 180.5 pts

The duress defense involves a defendant who reasonably believes the threat of another person to kill or grievously harm a third party unless the defendant commits a criminal offense (other than murder) as directed by that person.

Group of answer choices

True

False

Flag question: Question 19Question 190.5 pts

The felony murder rule is limited to cases where the defendant, while committing a felony, unintentionally kills the victim of the crime.

Group of answer choices

True

False

Flag question: Question 20Question 200.5 pts

The insanity test that focuses on a person's inability to control their behavior is:

Group of answer choices

The Modern Law test

The M'Naghten test

The Irresistible Impulse test

The Model Penal Code test

Flag question: Question 21Question 210.5 pts

Under the Model Penal Code, proximate cause focuses on___________________.

Group of answer choices

Actual cause

Actus reus

Mens rea

Intervening causes

Flag question: Question 22Question 220.5 pts

Voluntary intoxication is generally a defense against general intent crimes.

Group of answer choices

True

False

Flag question: Question 23Question 230.5 pts

When the attorney for a defendant pleads not guilty by reason of insanity, that attorney is claiming that the defendant does not have a factual understanding of the proceedings filed against him.

Group of answer choices

True

False

Flag question: Question 24Question 240.5 pts

When the defendant forms the intent to commit a crime, she is guilty of attempting that crime.

Group of answer choices

True

False

Flag question: Question 25Question 250.5 pts

Which is NOT a reason to bifurcate a trial that includes the insanity defense?

Group of answer choices

Reduction of confusion

Time saving

Judge decides insanity

5th Amendment protections

Flag question: Question 26Question 260.5 pts

Which of the following is NOT required for a conspiracy?

Group of answer choices

An agreement

Two people

Intent to commit crime

All parties to participate in crime

Flag question: Question 27Question 270.5 pts

Which of the following is considered when charging solicitation.

Group of answer choices

If the one solicited was a law enforcement officer

If the crime was completed

If there was an agreement for the commission of the crime

If the solicitor intended for a crime to be completed

Flag question: Question 28Question 280.5 pts

Which of the following mental states does NOT satisfy the malice aforethought requirement of murder under common law?

Group of answer choices

Intent to commit felony

Intent to commit trespass

Intent to kill

Depraved heart

Flag question: Question 29Question 290.5 pts

Which test for death became accepted under modern law?

Group of answer choices

Lack of complete brain function

Lack of blood circulation

Lack of cerebrum functioning

Lack of heart and lung function

Flag question: Question 30Question 300.5 pts

Which element of a crime could voluntary intoxication affect?

Group of answer choices

None if intoxication is voluntary

Actus reus

Mens rea

Defense

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Criminal Law

Authors: Jennifer Moore, John Worrall

3rd Edition

0135777623, 978-0135777626

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions