Question 11 In United States v. Zhang, the court held that O the language of the National Stolen Property Act was broad enough to include intangible property. O the history of the National Stolen Property Act showed that Congress meant it to cover tangible and in O the language of the National Stolen Property Act had been amended to cover digital property. O the indictment must be dismissed because it did not allege that Zhang stole goods, wares, or merchand Stolen Property Act