Question 12 (1 point) Emma, who is out for a jog along the river, notices Edward struggling to keep his head above water in a very strong current. Without considering her own safety, Emma dives in and pulls Edward to safety. Convinced he would have drowned without Emma's intervention, Edward, who is a successful businessman, offers to pay her $1000 for her selfless act. Emma is a struggling student who could really use the money, but when she arrives at Edward's office later in the afternoon to collect the money, Edward tells her he has reconsidered and offers to buy her lunch instead. Emma is stunned by this change of tune and declines. As she leaves Edward's office, she starts to get angry and wonders if she could successfully sue for the $1000 in small claims court. If you were to advise her on this issue, you would tell Emma a) her lawsuit would be successful because a judge would favour a struggling student over a businessman who weaseled out of his promise. Ob) she would be unsuccessful because a judge would decide it was legitimate for Edward to substitute a lunch as consideration for Emma's efforts. a) her lawsuit would be successful because a judge would favour a struggling student over a businessman who weaseled out of his promise. Ob) she would be unsuccessful because a judge would decide it was legitimate for Edward to substitute a lunch as consideration for Emma's efforts. Oc) her lawsuit would be successful because her rescue efforts are valuable consideration for Edward's promise to pay $1000. d) she would be unsuccessful because past consideration is not really consideration at all