> Question 13 24 pt Capital Financial has an investment project that provides the following cash flows: +30,000 (year 0) -5,500 [year 1) . -7,000 (year 2) . -8,000 (year 3) . -6,500 (year 4) The CEO of Capital Financial advocates that the firm uses NPV to evaluate this project instead of the traditional IRR rule. Why is this a good idea in this instance? You need to flip the IRR rule in this case There are mutually exclusive projects There could be multiple IRRS