QUESTION 2 (21 marks) You are a professor teaching an ethics course at a university. As an ethics professor at a university, you encounter a situation where one of your students, John, approaches you with a request to grade his assignment despite missing both the initial and the second opportunity submission dates. John explained that he was unable to meet the deadlines, as he was in an accident and could not complete the assignment earlier due to him being booked of by the doctor. On investigation into his situation you realised that he is telling all the other students that he did not have an accident but was in a bar fight two days before the first submission date, and that he will show them he doesnt have to submit by the second date and can still get his paper marked. Two of the students (friends of John) informed you that John made a wager of R500 that you will still grade his paper. It is apparent that grading his script would be unethical and inequitable towards other students. REQUIRED: 2.1 Apply an ethics-based reasoning process to solve the identified ethical dilemma. (15 marks) 2.2 Analysing all courses of action and their consequences for unethical behavior in the scenario involving yourself, as the ethics professor and John's late submission. Your answers must include discussion around the following 3 matters: Grading John's script despite the missed deadlines: Consequence: ? Potential disciplinary action: ? Denying John's request and adhering to the established deadlines: Consequence: ? Potential disciplinary action: ? Offering guidance and support to John while maintaining the established deadlines: Consequence: ? Potential disciplinary action: ? (6 marks)