Question 2 5 pts Citing consumer demand for even zanier commentary, Alfred Newmann sold Mad magazine to Crazy magazine. As part of the deal, Crazy gave Newmann, or a company that he controlled, advertising rights at a 95 percent discount for five years. Six months later, Newmann formed Normal magazine and began to use his advertising discount. About twelve months later, Newmann told Crazy that he was allocating his rights advertising rights to his other magazines, Even More Normal and Not So Normal. Newmann also stopped ordering advertising space for Normal and instead sent requests on behalf of his two new magazines. Crazy's other advertisers never liked Newmann and complained about this allocation. Crazy refused to allow this assignment, and Newmann sued. Based on the decision in Gold v. Ziff Communications Coc., the court in this case would most like rule in favor of O Newmann, because he notified Crazy of his intentions to assign the advertising rights to his other two magazines. O None of the above. O Crazy, because the assignment was not expressly allowed in the original agreement between with Newmann. Crazy, because it notified Newmann in a timely manner that it would not allow the assignment