Question $2$: First Amendment $($Seizure of FUSCHSIA membership records$)$ Alternatively, Ms$.$ Billiken contends that the special agents$$ seizure of FUSCHSIA$$s membership records was hostile, not neutral, to FUSCHSIA and violated the rights of Ms$.$ Billiken and all FUSCHSIA members to practice the Sith religion free from government interference. The agents argue that the seizure of FUSCHSIA$$s membership records was done pursuant to a generally applicable criminal statute $($BOBBA$),$ and that the search was conducted fairly as opposed to with hostility towards the Sith religion. Did Special Agents Johnson and Steele violate Ms$.$ Billiken$$s Free Exercise rights when they seized FUSCHSIA$$s membership records?

Question $2$ is a free exercise question. Technically$-$complete answers are expected to discuss, in some capacity, the cases from Unit $7($Yoder$,$ Smith, Trinity Lutheran, and Fulton$),$ with a particular emphasis on the $$neutral law of general applicability$$ test$/$exceptions from Smith.