Question 2 lb Marks On 1 October Footloose Pty Ltd placed the following notice in the Daily News newspaper: Special Shoes Special Discounts Footloose Pty Ltd is awaiting the delivery of the latest summer collection shoes from Italy. Styles include the new Slingback sandals and wedge heels. Prices start at $2000 per hundred pairs (certain styles only); big discounts may be negotiated for bulk orders. All inquiries to Ms Simone, Sales Manager, on 1400 765 432 or by fax on 06 9234 567'. On 2 October Famous Footwear sent the following fax to Ms Simone: We accept your offer in the Daily News. We wish to order 500 pairs at $2000 per hundred. Details on delivery to follow. On 4 October James, the owner of shoe retailer James's Shoes, which had several regional stores throughout Australia, sent the following fax to Ms Simone at Footloose: We refer to your notice in the Daily News and would like to purchase 2000 pairs of Slingback sandals. Our best price is $30,000 including GST and delivery. Please advise. On 6 October Ms Simone sent the following fax to James: Footloose will sell 2000 pairs of slingback sandals for $30,000, excluding delivery. Payment by cash or bank cheque is due on delivery. Please advise. James immediately wrote the following letter to Ms Simone, which was mailed on 8 October: We refer to your fax of 6 October and are prepared to meet you on those terms. Please let me know the earliest delivery date. On 10 October Ms Simone telephoned James. After a short discussion James faxed Ms Simone a copy of the letter of 8 October. The parties agreed that James's Shoes would take delivery of the sandals from Footloose's Sydney warehouse on 1 November. Referring to relevant case law and giving reasons for your propositions, discuss the legal effect of each of the forms of correspondence between Footloose, Famous Footwear and James's Shoes that took place between 1 October and 10 October