Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
QUESTION 2 Reconsider the Electronic Toys Co. problem presented in previous Scenario 2. Sharon Lowe is concerned that there is a significant chance that the
QUESTION 2 Reconsider the Electronic Toys Co. problem presented in previous Scenario 2. Sharon Lowe is concerned that there is a significant chance that the vitally important deadline of 57 days will not be met. Therefore, to make it virtually certain that the deadline will be met, she has decided to crash the project, using the CPM method of time-cost trade-offs to determine how to do this in the most economical way. Sharon now has gathered the data needed to apply this method, as given below. Activity Normal Time Crash Time Normal Cost Crash Cost B C D E F 12 days 23 days 15 days 27 days 18 days 6 days 9 days 18 days 12 days 21 days 14 days 4 days $210,000 $410,000 $ 290,000 $440,000 $350,000 $160,000 $270,000 $460,000 $320,000 $500,000 $410,000 $210,000 The normal times are the estimates of the means obtained from the original data in previous scenario. The mean critical path gives an estimate that the project will finish in 51 days. However, Sharon knows from the earlier analysis that some of the pessimistic estimates are far larger than the means, so the project duration might be considerably longer than 51 days. Therefore, to better ensure that the project will finish within 57 days, she has decided to require that the estimated project duration based on means (as used throughout the CPM analysis) must not exceed 47 days. Question: Use marginal cost analysis to determine the most economical way of reducing the length of this path to 47 days. QUESTION 2 Reconsider the Electronic Toys Co. problem presented in previous Scenario 2. Sharon Lowe is concerned that there is a significant chance that the vitally important deadline of 57 days will not be met. Therefore, to make it virtually certain that the deadline will be met, she has decided to crash the project, using the CPM method of time-cost trade-offs to determine how to do this in the most economical way. Sharon now has gathered the data needed to apply this method, as given below. Activity Normal Time Crash Time Normal Cost Crash Cost B C D E F 12 days 23 days 15 days 27 days 18 days 6 days 9 days 18 days 12 days 21 days 14 days 4 days $210,000 $410,000 $ 290,000 $440,000 $350,000 $160,000 $270,000 $460,000 $320,000 $500,000 $410,000 $210,000 The normal times are the estimates of the means obtained from the original data in previous scenario. The mean critical path gives an estimate that the project will finish in 51 days. However, Sharon knows from the earlier analysis that some of the pessimistic estimates are far larger than the means, so the project duration might be considerably longer than 51 days. Therefore, to better ensure that the project will finish within 57 days, she has decided to require that the estimated project duration based on means (as used throughout the CPM analysis) must not exceed 47 days. Question: Use marginal cost analysis to determine the most economical way of reducing the length of this path to 47 days
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started