Question 22

A plaintiff who is injured as a result of obvious negligence may be allowed to use this doctrine to reverse the burden of proof when the breach is impossible to prove:

a)	res ipsa loquitur
b)	res judicata
c)	negligence per se
d)	post ipso factor

Question 23

A 13 year-old who causes injury while operating a snowmobile is held to this standard of care:

a)	child of like age and experience.
b)	ordinary, reasonable, prudent person.

Question 24

The only defense to strict liability may be:

a)	comparative negligence.
b)	contributory negligence.
c)	negligence per se.
d)	assumption of the risk.

Question 25

Which of the following may reduce the ORPP Standard of Care in a negligence case?

a)	Being a child.
b)	Mental disability.
c)	Physical disability.
d)	Innkeeper.