Question 27 0 /7 pts In January 2019 Ninja Ranger Compacting purchased and installed a new X1600 Red Super-Smasher used in compacting cars, SUVs, and small trucks into 2 cubic yards of compacted metal. The X-1600 Red cost $1,034,000 and had a "useful life" of 7 years. Recently the firm's CEO became aware of a new technology that promised many advantages over the X-1600 Red, including compacting the junk vehicles into 1 cubic yard of compacted metal, instead of 2 cubic yards. He asked his CPA to do a financial analysis to determine if a new Super-Smasher called the X-2000 Blue could be an economically viable replacement for a Super-Smasher (the X-1600) that was only two years old. The CPA determined that the new technology could be purchased for $900,000 today and would have a useful life of 5 years before it would likely become technologically obsolete and be essentially worthless. (The X-2000 Blue runs hotter than the X-1600 Red and has a shorter useful life). For depreciation purposes the company uses the straight line method. Frank Turtle, the Ninja Ranger Compacting VP of Scrap Yard Services and the firms' CPA agreed that the new machine could significantly improve production and create higher revenues for the firm. With this information the CPA estimated that the new technology will produce EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) of $512,000 per year for the next 5 years. The current machine is expected to produce EBITDA of $365,000 per year. The current machine is being depreciated on a straight line basis over a useful life of 7 years after which it will have a $40,000 salvage value. All other expenses of the two machines are identical. The market value of the current machine is $525,000. The tax rate is 21% and the cost of capital is 12%. Calculate the NPV of the replacement decision and choose the best answer below. NOTE: DO NOT make any assumptions regarding the tax treatment for the gain or loss on the disposal the X-1600 Red.O Keep the Red, NPV of Buying Blue = -$452,611 O Buy the Blue, NPV = $68,063 O Buy the Blue, NPV = $72,389 But the Blue, NPV = $51,080 O Keep the Red, NPV of Buying Blue = -$64,593Question 28 Original Score: 0 / 3 pts Regraded Score: 3 / 3 pts This question has been regraded. Concluding the Ninja Rangers problem, now consider the gain or loss on the sale of the X-1600 Red compactor. Assuming that 5 years of useful life remain on the machine, would the inclusion of the amount of gain or loss change the decision made in the question above? (This is a "throw back question" and requires that you remember how to calculate the gain or loss of the sale of a machine) This Problem Counts 3 points O Does Not Change the Decision, an After Tax Loss on Sale results in positive cash flow $47,250, increasing the NPV of the Blue Option O Does Not Change the Decision, an After Tax Loss on Sale Results in negative cash flow of $47,250 but still leaves an overall positive NPV of Buying Blue O Changes the Decision to Buy Blue to Keeping the Red, NPV of the Buy Blue option becomes -$152,611 O Changes the Decision to Buy Blue to Keeping the Blue, NPV of the Buy Blue option becomes -$105,361