Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Question 29 1 pts Under the Disabilities Act, employers are required to make reasonable accommodations. This could include: 0 providing a reader for a blind
Question 29 1 pts Under the Disabilities Act, employers are required to make reasonable accommodations. This could include: 0 providing a reader for a blind employee 0 providing wheelchair access to company facilities 0 modifying work schedules to accommodate disabled employees 0 redesigning a couple of workstations so they are usable by disabled persons 0 all of the above choices Question 31 1 pts Which of the following would not be a violation of the Rehabilitation Act or the Americans with Disabilities Act, because it goes beyond the scope of the legislation? 0 using standardized tests that screen out people with disabilities 0 refusing to hirejob applicants because they have a history of drug abuse 0 askingjob applicants if they have disabilities not hiring a disabled person because the bathrooms cannot accommodate wheelchairs 0 all of the above choices are likely illegal Question 32 1 pts Davis worked at Bi-Lo for four years. During that time, she kept adding to her collection of body piercings, tattoos, cuttings and scars, and was a card-carrying member of the Church of Body Modication, which is a bona de religious organization. Bi-Lo's dress code required that employees have a "reasonably professional appearance" at work. The company asked her to remove or hide her facial piercings. which she refused to do. She was red and claimed she had been discriminated against. The court will likely hold that 0 she has been discriminated against based on her religious beliefs and practices. 0 she has been discriminated against because of her piercings, tattoos, cuttings and scars which are a disability when used in excess. 0 she has not been discriminated against. as she is not professional in appearance. 0 she could be red by BiLo generally because she belongs to a strange religion. 0 Bi-Lo can re her for any reason. It's their business. Question 36 1 pts Which is NOT a requirement under the Drug-Free Workplace Act? 0 All companies of more than $25,000 worth of business with the federal government must certify they have "drugfree" workplace. 0 Companies must publish a policy statement and state what action taken against employees who violate policy. 0 Companies must establish drug awareness program and make known availability of program. 0 Employees of companies must notify employers of any drugrelated convictions. 0 All of the above are requirements under the Act. Question 38 1 pts Ballalatak worked for Hawkeye Downs as a security supervisor. When employees were injured in a work-related accident, the injury was reported to Ballalatak who drove to scene, helped get men to hospital and lled out accident report. Later general manager, Nowers, told the injured men to meet with him before returning to work. In the meeting he told the men their medical expenses would be taken care of without ling for workers' compensation. Later, injured men told Ballalatak they were concerned they would not receive workers' compensation benets. Ballalatak then told Nowers that the workers had rights to benets. Nowers red him. What will be the outcome of the case? 0 Ballalatak will win this case because he was red for asking regarding workers' compensation duties to the injured workers. 0 Ballalatak can be red for insubordination or usually for any reason under the doctrine of "employment at will" and Iowa law does not protect him as an internal advocate for other employees. b.Ba||alatak will win his case because his discharge is contrary to public policy and he was raising concerns to his employer regarding workers' compensation claims. 0 Internal advocates such as Ballalatak are exercising their statutory rights under the workers' compensation laws. All but a are correct answers. Question 43 1 pts The primary purpose of the Administrative Procedures Act is: O to provide the judiciary with procedural rules in administrative cases 0 to dene procedural rules and formalities of administrative agencies and to create some uniformity procedurally across all the agencies 0 to create a federal bureaucracy to handle the complex problems of business 0 to regulate the procedural requirements of criminal law 0 to amend the common law so the courts can delegate some of their authority to administrative agencies Question 44 1 pts The Clean Air Act requires states with "nonattainment" (dirty air) areas to create permit program and regulates "new or modied major stationary sources" of air pollution. Under the EPA regulations a plant with multiple sources of pollution are treated as one source of pollution. This is known as the "Bubble Concept", that is, it is as if multiple sources are under a "bubble". The National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) challenged EPA's "Bubble Rule" as inconsistent with Clean Air Act. In this case the court will hold that Q If Congress grants an agency such as the EPA the right to regulate but leaves "gaps" concerning specics of carrying out the statute (here the Clean Air Act), the Agencies are allowed to fill gaps left by Congress. 0 If an agency "lls gaps" left open by a statute, the regulations lling those gaps are valid unless the agency decisions are "arbitrary, capricious or manifestly contrary" to statute. O Courts will usually defer to the administrative interpretations of a Congressional statute. O The court struck down the "Bubble Concept" as discriminatory against those manufacturers who have more than one manufacturing facility. 0 All but d are correct answers
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started