Question $3$

$1$ try left

What was the significance of the ruling in the Vancouver Public Library case where a security guard asked a library worker if she was interested in having drinks together after work?

A$.$ The court determined that the request to have "drinks" implied alcohol consumption, which could alter the decision making of the librarian.

B$.$ The court determined that a single event with no adverse impact did not meet the threshold of sexual harassment.

C$.$ The court determined that sexual harassment is limited by gender identity.

D$.$ The court determined that management is accountable for the behaviour of all workers in the workplace, regardless of who they work for.