Question 33 According to the Supreme Court in Castle Rock v. Gonzalez, where the police did not act on information that the plaintiff's ex-husband was violating a restraining order, Because restraining order violations ight to have the order enforced. A person does not have the constitutional right to enfo se it does not have monetary value. A person does not have the constitutional right to enfor ave discretion in who to arrest. B and C. Question 34 A person has a right to a jury trial if and only if facing the possibility of Any jail sentence More than 6 months in jail More than 1 year in jail No answer text provided. Question 35 In Perry v. New Hampshire, where a witn spect being detained by police on suspicion of a car burglary, The defendant was entitled to a hearing The identification wa cessarily suggestive. The defendant was not entitled to a hear lice did not cause the suggestive circumstances. The defendant was not entitled to a hearing on the reliability of the identification, because there was nothing suggestive about it. Question 36 In Neil v. Biggers, where a rape victim identified the defendant seven months after the crime when he walked past her in the police station, the Court found that the identification procedure was Suggestive, and therefore had to be suppressed Suggestive, but nevertheless reliable under the totality of the circumstances, and therefore admissible Not suggestive at all, and therefore admissible Not suggestive at all, but unreliable because of the passage of time Question 37 At a defendant's first appearance before a judge, which of the following does NOT typically occur Reading of the charges against the defendant Setting of bail Appointment of counsel Plea bargaining} Question 38 In Rompilla v. Beard, where the defendant was sentenced to death after killng someone in a bar and setting him on fire, the Supreme Court held that i preparing for his sentencing, his trial lawyers. 'Were not ineffective, because they interviewed everyone whose names they had gotten from the defendant. 'Were not ineffective, because on the horrific facts of the case, nothing they could have done would have made a difference. Were ineffective, because they failed to scour the earth for every potentially helpful witness. Were ineffective, because they failed to read the il o his p r conviction, which had helpful information about his upbringing and history. Question 39 'Which of the following is NOT one of the variables listed in Manson v. Brathwaite for determining the reliability of an eyewitness identification? \"The witness's opportunity to view the perpetrator at the time of the crime 'The accuracy of the witness' description of the perpetrator prior to the identification procedure. The witness's level of ertainty in the identification. 'The length of the time between the crime and the identifcation. 'Whether the witness confessed to the crime. } Question 40 Where the State seeks to introduce a defendant's confession at trial, \"The State must prove that the statement was voluntarly given, beyond a easonable doubt, i order to introduce the statement against the Defendant The State must prove that the statement was voluntarly given, by a preponderance of the evidence,in arder to ntroduce the statement against the Defendant. \"The Defendant must prove that the statement was coerced, beyond a reasonable doub, in order to exclude the statement from evidence. 'The Defendant must prove that the statement was coerced, by a preponderance of the evidence, in order to exclude the statement from evidence. ? Question 41 In Ewing v. California, where the defendant was sentenced under California's *3 strikes" law to 25 years in prison for stealing a $400 golf club, the Supreme Court ruled \"The sentence was constitutional, because the golf club was really expensive \"The sentence was constitutional, because the State has a legitimate interest in punishing repeat offenders. The sentence was cruel and unusual because the value of the club did not warrant prison time. \"The sentence was cruel and unusual, because the length of the sentence was grossly disproportionate to the value of the club