Question 41 1 pts You leave your 5-year-old kid sister at a hairstylist to have them wash and trim her hair -- a $30 service. You have left your kid sister with the hairstylist, and when you return, the stylist washes and trim's your sister's hair also paints her nails which is an extra $10. You pay them for the wash and trim. What about the extra $10 in services? 0 an express contract existed; you must pay the $10 0 an implied contract existed; you must pay the $10 0 a quasicontract existed; you must pay the $10 0 no contract for the nail service existed, no extra payment 0 at law you must pay for any service someone does for you under $20. Question 42 1 pts Under freedom of contract, basically you can make a contract for anything as long as it is not illegal. 0 True 0 False Question 43 1 pts Someone lost his keys in a Clemson University parking lot. He posted a sign at the entrance to the parking lot which says that if the keys are returned to him, he will give the nder $100, as the keys are on his favorite key chain. Someone who does not know about the reward and has not seen the sign, nds the keys and turns them into the Clemson University police, who in turn give the keys to the owner. Later the nder learns of the sign that was posted concerning the reward. The owner 0 must pay the reward to the nder due to public policy considerations that encourage the completion of such contracts 0 must pay the reward because the unilateral contract was completed 0 must pay the reward because there was an intent to make a valid offer and to be bound by that offer 0 does not have to pay the reward because the offer was not communicated to the person who found the keys 0 None of the above is a correct answer. Question 44 1 pts "Larry, if you trim the branches on all the trees in my yard, I will pay you $50." Larry says nothing but trims the branches of the trees later that day. There is what may be called: 0 a voidable contract 0 an unenforceable contract 0 a unilateral contract 0 a bilateral contract 0 no contract Question 45 1 pts Elizabeth says "Alice, I will sell you my car for $5,000." Alice says, "I'll give you $4,500. " Elizabeth says "No." Later Alice calls Elizabeth and says, "I have $5,000 and want the car." Elizabeth: 0 must sell the car for $5,000, since the offer was accepted 0 must sell the car for $5,000 since the offer was accepted in a timely fashion 0 does not have to sell the car due to the counteroffer by Alice, a rejection by Elizabeth and a new offer outstanding by Alice to Elizabeth 0 does not have to sell the car because her offer was not accepted in a timely fashion 0 The court can require Elizabeth to sell the car since Alice has offered to pay her the price of Elizabeth's original offer. Question 46 1 pts Salais bought a 4-year-old car from a dealership during the winter. When the weather warmed up. the car began to smell. The warmer it got, the worse the smell. She took the car back to the dealership and someone told her it was from a dead animal. She was doubtful about that and she led a claim with her insurance company. State Farm hired a biohazard clean-up company and it was determined the odor was human, the car had been stolen 3 times and had been used as a rental vehicle. In a lawsuit by Salais against the dealership. 0 Because there was no actual harm to her, she will likely lose this lawsuit. 0 She might not receive the full value of the car as she wants to give the car back to the dealership: however, she likely may receive money for the trouble of the detection of the problem and cleanup of the vehicle. Question 47 1 pts You contact George's Paving Company on Wednesday and ask the price for paving your driveway. He quotes you $1500. You tell him that you will pay him the money if he paves the driveway. He says he'll be happy to do so the following Monday. You say that is ne. In this case, there is a O bilateralcontract O unilateral contract 0 express contract 0 implied contract 0 both a and c are correct answers. Question 48 1 pts An uncle promised to give his nephew $5000 if he did not drink alcohol, smoke, or gamble for a whole year. [Assume all of these activities are legal.) The nephew claimed and proved that he did as agreed and so was due the money one year later. which he was not given. When the nephew sued, the court would hold that the money: 0 had to be paid because he did the things that the uncle asked him to do and this is adequate consideration 0 does not have to be paid because this is a family matter. not one for the courts. 0 did not have to be paid because there was no clear acceptance 0 did not have to be paid because there was no relationship between the value offered (money) and good behavior (the vices that the nephew gave up] 0 did not have to be paid because there was inadequate consideration Question 49 1 pts Gulfstream Aerospace told its employees that as a condition of continued employment they had to agree to a new dispute resolution policy that would take effect in two weeks. Caley and other employees of Gulfstream sued. contending the new policy was not backed by consideration. so there was no enforceable contract. The appeals court will hold that: O the employees would have to be given something extra beyond the same employment conditions for there to be consideration for a contract 0 continued employment after the twoweek period is consideration: there is a contract 0 there is no contract because the parties never bargained O in employment relationships there are no contracts, so consideration is irrelevant 0 none of the other choices