QUESTION 41 The Chipotle company sues the State of Washington. In the lawsuit, Chipotle claims and puts forth the argument that a particular Washington law is in violation of the commerce clause. The court will side with Chipotle if the Washington law imposes a substantial burden on a. noneconomic activity b. interstate commerce. c. the state. d. a local government QUESTION 42 In the case of Hubert v. Santa Monica, the highest court in California ruled that a minor could cancel a motor vehicle sales contract. Now, a lower bral court in Califomia is hearing Panang v. Los Angeles, a case with closely related facts. Under the doctrine of stare decisis, the trial court is likely to a. allow the minor to rescind the contract b.require the minor to fulfill the contract Oc. disregard the Hubert v. Santa Monica case d. do nothing.