QUESTION 47

1. A client comes to an attorney and officially hires the attorney to represent them. There isthena converation with the attorney, client and paralegal [who is taking notes for the attorney] present. The client says they killed someone yesterday during a robbery. The paralegal is deeply disturbed because she lives in the area of the robbery. She goes to the police with the notes and turns them over.The client is arrested and at trial claims the Attorney-Client privilegeto keep out his confessionmade while the paralegalwas present. Theprosecution claims there is no privilege since the paralegal is a third partythat voided the privilege. Who is correct and why?

QUESTION 48

1. The case of Katz v the United States [Bookie using the telephone] rendered a ruling on privacy and what is protected. What is the main ruling on the Right to Privacy that became a precedent for other cases?

QUESTION 49

1. What was the Courts rationale behind creating the "Good Faith Exception" to the exclusionary rule?

QUESTION 50

1. In order for the Plain View doctrine to apply several criteria must be met. For exmaple the items seized must have been readily apparant as illegal when first seen. One key requirment deals with the officers location. What is the key requirement related to the officers location?

QUESTION 44

1. The right to confronta witness at trial isnotabsolute. Give/list an exception of when the witnessdoes nothave to be in the same room when then give testimony. [x]