Question $5$

$1$ pts

In Erie Railroad Co$.$ v$.$ Tompkins, where Tompkins sued a New York company that owned a train that hit him in Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court reversed the decision for Tompkins by the court of appeals because it held that:

none of the other choices are correct

applying the doctrine of Swift $v.$ Tyson rendered impossible equal protection of the law

applying the doctrine of Swift $v.$ Tyson created a diversity of citizenship problem

applying the doctrine of Swift $v.$ Tyson created a substantial party problem

applying the doctrine of Swift $v.$ Tyson rendered impossible avoidance of the in rem proble