Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Question 5 1 pts In Erie Railroad Co . v . Tompkins, where Tompkins sued a New York company that owned a train that hit
Question
pts
In Erie Railroad Co v Tompkins, where Tompkins sued a New York company that owned a train that hit him in Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court reversed the decision for Tompkins by the court of appeals because it held that:
none of the other choices are correct
applying the doctrine of Swift Tyson rendered impossible equal protection of the law
applying the doctrine of Swift Tyson created a diversity of citizenship problem
applying the doctrine of Swift Tyson created a substantial party problem
applying the doctrine of Swift Tyson rendered impossible avoidance of the in rem proble
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started