Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Question 6 (1 point) 3 Reyaz signed an employment agreement with ABC Company on October 1, 2000. His contract stated that if he were terminated,
Question 6 (1 point) 3 Reyaz signed an employment agreement with ABC Company on October 1, 2000. His contract stated that if he were terminated, he would receive only the minimum termination and severance pay under the Employment Standards Act. Ironically, on 6 August 15, 2015, the 15th anniversary of his start date with the company, his boss terminated his employment because they no longer needed his services. Reyaz needs your advice. Which one of the following is most correct? 9 It is unfortunate that Reyaz signed this agreement because it limits his legal rights. Reyaz will receive his statutory minimums in accordance with the agreement he signed. Reyaz should pursue his common law right to pay in lieu of notice because the employer did not provide him an adequate reason for terminating him. Reyaz will received his statutory entitlements based on 15 years of service to the company. Reyaz should pursue his common law right to pay in lieu of notice because there was no consideration for the agreement that he signed.1: Question 5 (1 point) N You work for the HR department of a large manufacturing company which is trying to cut costs. A proposal has been made to bring on an independent contractor to save costs. This independent contractor will work on the production line from 9am to 5 6 5pm each day and will report to Andrea Nixon. This person's initial contract will be for one year. If things work out, the contract will be renewed. This way, the company does not have to pay any deductions for this person! The 8 9 contract states that this contractor may only work for this company and no one else. What would you advise the company? So long as the company does not supply the tools for this person, he/she will be an independent contractor. This situation fails the three-part test used to determine whether a relationship is truly an independent contractor relationship. The company will be saving a lot of money by having an independent contractor fill this role. This person is truly an employee, not an independent contractor. The company should not have the contractor report to anyone or else it will be seen as an employer/employee relationship
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started