Question 7 1 pts Refer to Table 7. The results show a Beta = -.49 for the relationship of positive relationship and caregiver anger. Which of the following is the correct interpretation of this result? Table 7. Regression Model Predicting Outcomes for Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients During Cancer Treatment (N = 17) Predictor Caregiver Outcomes Global Strain Fatigue Anger Beta Beta Beta Caregiver Sex 14 (1 = tomake, 0 = male) - 15 Caregiver age Caregiving Time 44 15 Demands Positive Relationship Preparedness for Caregiving 21 Adjusted AF 20 Model significance Note: p-values are only given for statistically significant relationships. Non-significant p-values are not shown. O Caregivers who had a less positive relationship with their family member expressed more anger about their role. For every 1 SD decrease in the positivity of the relationship, there was a .49 SD increase in anger. O No need to interpret this statisic because it was not statistically significant. O Caregivers who had a less positive relationship with their family member had 1.5 times theQuestion 8 1 pts Refer to Table 7. How much variance in caregiver fatigue was explained by this group of demographic and other caregiver characteristics. after controlling for other variables in the model? Table 7. Simultaneous Regression Model Pre acting Outcomes for Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients During Cancer Treatment (N = IT) Predictor Caregiver Outcomes Global Strain Fatigue Anger Beta Beta Beta Caregiver Sex (1 . Smale: 0 a male] 14 =15 - 01 44 25 Demands Poulive Relationship 101 Preparedness lor 18 -25 -.13 40 21 33 16 Model Signedcance Note: P.values are only given for statistically significant re ationships. Non-significant p-values are not shown. O .29 O .36 O 16% O 33%