Question:

Among them, select specific cases involving local or international media. Then use the quadrants of the Potter box and use them to make your own judgments about the decision of the case. In this regard, the media dilemma and media ethics considerations that the case has experienced, may or may have experienced will be analyzed. In short, the final question of the case will be solved by asking "Is this morally reasonable?"

structure:

The structure of the following five parts must be fully covered.

1. Situation

Make a brief, very brief summary of the facts of the case.

2. Values

Explain the values involved.

Examples of values are: (1) professional values, such as the public's right to know, personal privacy, the right to tell the truth or the right to balance and fairness, (2) legal values, (3) patriotic values, (4) religious values (not 't kill the unborn, eg), (5) Values based on freedom (women's right to choose, for example)

3. Principles

Explain which of the above five ethical principles you use as your basic principle.

This section should contain one of the five ethical principles you choose to use, such as Aristotle's golden mean. few paragraphs explaining why you think the principle you chose is correct for this situation-the reason you used the principle.

4. Loyalty

Discuss who your main loyalty belongs to. Determine your primary loyalty based on the following responsibilities, namely

One kind. Responsibility to ourselves

Responsibility to customers/subscribers/supporters

C. Responsibility to our organization or company

d. Responsibility to professional colleagues

e. Responsibility to society

Please note that this part should be the second longest part. Explain the main loyalty or responsibility and the reason for choosing it. In a few paragraphs, write down the difficulties encountered when making choices. Which loyalty level was chosen first but then changed, why? In the selection, which aspects are the most contradictory?

5. Judgment

After carefully considering the four elements in the Potter box, the final judgment or decision is what it is.

Therefore, this section is the most important part of the written analysis. This part should be the longest and most thorough, about four or five paragraphs.