Question can be found in the attached files. NOTE: This is only ONE question with several parts.

The Kamloops Outdoors Corporation, which produces a highly successful line of summer lotions and insect repellents and sells them to wholesalers, has decided to diversify in order to stabilize its sales throughout the year. A natural area for the company to consider is the production of winter lotions and creams to prevent dry and chapped skin. After considerable research, the company has developed a winter products line. However, because of the conservative nature of company management, the president has decided to introduce only one of the new products for this coming winter. If the product is a success, there will be further expansion in future years. The product selected is a lip balm to be sold in a lipstick-type tube. The company will sell the product to wholesalers in boxes of 24 tubes for $16.00 per box. Because of available capacity, the company will incur no additional xed charges to produce the product. However, to allocate a fair share of the company's present fixed costs to the new product, the product will absorb a $130,000 xed charge. Using the estimated sales and production of 100,000 boxes of lip balm as the standard volume, the accounting department has developed the following costs per box of 24 tubes: Direct labour $3.80 Direct materials 5.80 Total overhead 2.80 Total $12.40 Kamloops Outdoors has approached a cosmetics manufacturer to discuss the possibility of purchasing the tubes for the new product. The purchase price of the empty tubes from the cosmetics manufacturer would be $1.90 per 24 tubes. If Kamloops Outdoors accepts the purchase proposal, it is estimated that direct labour and variable overhead costs would be reduced by 10% and direct materials costs would be reduced by 20%. Should Kamloops Outdoors make or buy the tubes? (Round answers to 2 decimal places, e.g. 15.25. If an amount reduces the net income then enter with a negative sign preceding the number e.g. -15,000 or parenthesis, e. 9. (15,000).) Kamloops should the tubes. What would be the maximum purchase price acceptable to Kamloops Outdoors for the tubes? (Round answer to 2 decimal places, e.g. 15.25.) Maximum purchase price $ Instead of sales of 100,000 boxes, revised estimates show a sales volume of 125,000 boxes. At this new volume, the company must acquire additional equipment, at an annual rental charge of $10,000, to manufacture the tubes. However, this incremental cost would be the only additional xed cost, even if sales increased to 300,000 boxes. (The 300,000 level is the goal for the third year of production.) Under these circumstances, should Kamloops Outdoors make or buy the tubes? Alternative 1: Purchase all the tubes Alternative 2: Produce all the tubes $ Plus: rent on new machine Total annual cost $ Kamloops Outdoors should :3 the tubes. The company has the option of making and buying at the same time. What would be your answer to (c) if this alternative was considered? Alternative 1: Purchase all the tubes $ Alternative 2: Produce all the tubes $ Plus: rent on new machine Total annual cost $ Alternative 3: Produce 100,000 tubes $ Plus: rent on new machine Purchase 25,000 tubes Total annual cost $ Kamloops Outdoors should consider :3 as it is least expensive