QUESTION- Is a virtue a virtue because of what it is in itself, such as courage, hope, or integrity, or is it a virtue because of how it fits positively with its social framework? So is it courage to rush into a burning house to rescue a child? What about to rescue a dog? What about to rescue a hamster? What about to rescue a book of photographs? What about to rescue a set of pots? This is a difficult question because it calls for a sophisticated analysis of the nature of virtues and the meaning of social relations. The courage does not appear to be just in the person-act, but also how the act relates to the way other people evaluate various components of the act. Choose a virtue such as courage, hope, integrity, generosity, love, compassion, or honesty. Identify a situation where you demonstrated that virtue. What was it about the situation that indicated you were virtuous? Did others agree with you? Disagree with you? Can you imagine a situation where acting the same way would not be perceived as virtuous? Based on that story, what do you think the relationship is between a virtue and its social context? Which is more important, the act or the way others interpret it? Make sure you justify your position.

COULD YOU PLEASE ANSWER THIS QUESTION IN 350 WORDS THANKS :)