QUESTIONS:There are two questions in this assessment task. Students must answer both

questions. Students should note question 2 has four parts to it.

Two marks are specifically set aside for English expression and referencing in your answer. This is negatively marked, that is you will lose mark for each error up to a maximum loss of 2 marks.

Make reference in your answers to relevant cases and sections of relevant legislation, when appropriate.

Question 1:6 marks

Frank was concerned about the heavy drinking habits of his favourite nephew, Nick. So, in June, in an effort to break Nick of his routine drinking, Frank offered to pay Nick $1,000 if Nick abstained from alcohol for one month starting on 1 July. Nick had himself become concerned for his health and just before his uncle's proposal, had joined Alcoholics Anonymous ('AA'). As one of the conditions for membership of the AA group, Nick had signed a document promising to use his best efforts to abstain from alcohol.

Nick did not drink alcohol at all during the month of July. He admits that this was more out of concern for his health and the promise to the AA group than any thought of financial reward. However, he nonetheless wants to know the legal position with respect to any claim against his uncle for the $1,000.

Advise Nick fully as to whether he has a binding contract with Frank.

Question 2:

Donald and Hugh were both members of gemstone clubs. They met at a meeting. Hugh had a stand with the sign:

For Sale: Mixed Gemstones at Marked Prices

Donald was looking for a stone suitable for setting in a ring. He selected a stone priced $450.00 and purchased it from Hugh. The stone Donald purchased was later identified as a topaz. Donald wishes to return the stone to Hugh and claim his money back.

Discuss Donald's rights and the legal implications of each of the following possible situations.