R v Ewanchuk [1999] 1 SCR 330 ( No Means No)

1. Explain why the case is precedent setting

2. Refer to at leasttwo legal concepts explored in the course that are either mentioned directly/indirectly during the Supreme Court hearing/decision (i.e Section 1/Section 33 or any element of the Charter or other Constitutional document /Rule of Law, /Factors Causing legal Change , Legal Schools of thought (i.e.Marxism, Feminism, Restraint of power etc) Division of powers, Branches of Government (Executive, legislative Judicial), Individuals and Collectivities that change law (I.e Intervenors/Interest Groups) etc etc

3. Include a brief analysis of at least one other case referred to by either the lawyers arguing the case or the judges determining the outcome.