R. v. Marshall(1999) - Indigenous Treaty Rights

3. Describe in detail which right(s) or freedom(s) was at issue in this case? Why/How has this right been infringed upon? 4. Which section of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was used? Did Section 1 - the reasonable limits clause justify the infringement? Explain why or why not. Was there another section of the Charter that provided the remedy/justification for the infringement for the case? If so, how/why? 5. Do you agree or disagree with the court's decision? Use details from the case to support your opinion. State your opinion on whether or not the Charter worked for the better of society, or for the worse in the case you examined. Did a guilty person get away with their crime because of a Charter violation? Did the Charter really do its job in the case you studied? PART C (Step 6): A proper functioning bibliography proper bibliography. This assignment requires concise thought and