Raj Haji, a 50 year-old business executive, joined Purewater Corp. of London, Ontario ("Purewater") in July 2019.He was hired as Vice President, Operations and Marketing, with a mandate to oversee the construction of a fresh-water bottling plant near a spring located outside of Orangeville, Ontario and to develop markets for the company's products throughout North America.Prior to joining Purewater, Raj had been running a similar, very successful operation for a corporation located in British Columbia.Raj left that corporation based on the express assurance that the Ontario company was viable and that it would be able to finance the new plant and related marketing initiatives effectively.By March of 2020, Raj had settled supply contracts with six companies and was close to landing three more, including a major deal with an American brewery that wanted to use its own brand name on some of Purewater's products. In April 2020, the company fired Raj, accusing him of dishonesty and coming to work drunk.Raj had registered several trademarks relating to the company's products in his own personal name, as the company did not have sufficient funds to register the marks itself.The President of Purewater was made aware that Raj would be registering the marks in his own name, on the understanding that Raj would assign the registered marks to the company as soon as Raj was repaid for the registration costs and related legal fees he had incurred.There was no evidence that Raj had ever come to work drunk.

Does Raj have grounds for legal recourse in connection with his dismissal from Purewater?What factors would the courts take into account in considering Raj's case?What remedies, if any, would be available to Raj?Please explain your answer fully, with reference to significant case law and relevant legal principles.