Randy promised to buy Greg's tractor for $$12,000.$ Greg drew up the contract. Unfortunately, Greg was not very good with the keyboard and typed in $$1,200$ as the price of the tractor. Randy noticed that the contract said $$1,200,$ not $$12,000,$ and was very pleased. He signed it without saying anything.

When it was time to make the exchange, Randy gave Greg $$1,200.$ In response to Greg's question about the remaining money, Randy pulled out the contract and showed him that it said $$1,200.$ Greg immediately responded that he had made a typographical error. Randy said that there was no mistake on his part because he knew exactly what he was doing and that he thought that Greg had decided to give him a deal on the tractor because they were neighbors.

Which of the following is Greg's best argument for a rescission of the contract?

Group of answer choices

That because a bilateral contract, as well as a unilateral mistake was involved, most courts would grant relief.

That a unilateral mistake was involved and that courts typically allow relief in situations involving unilateral mistakes as opposed to mutual mistakes.

That the mistake resulted from an accidental clerical error and that it would be unconscionable to enforce the contract.

That the mistake resulted from a sale of goods, as opposed to the provision of services, and that courts are more likely to grant relief for a mistake when actual physical work is not involved.