Read article:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10676-019-09516-z

What are the implications of the findings/results (i.e. discussion) in this article, and the argument used to support it;

- what are the implications of the current regulation of online hate speech

- what are the implications of the automatic detection and classification of hate speech

- What are the implications of Quarantining hate speech

- what are the implications of the article overall?

• Issue: Online hate speech have become a significant issue worldwide in every social media platform
• Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Reddit, etc have a different ways to interact and solve the problem
• These companies need to solve the problem by providing a safe environment for users from hate speech but also at the same time need to provide freedom of speech to users as well.
• Facebook as an example create a AI system that wiped out all of the hate speech comments and posts from their network. They also hired thousands of moderators to track and monitor users' hate speech activity to judge whether it's a joke or a hate speech activity.
• Instagram and Twitters have the most efficient way of creating a quarantine hate speech system.
• Quarantine hate speech method allows people to select themself as sensitive content so they could post and have the right to speak on social media.
• People could decide they agree to view or read those sensitive posts, comments or the system could block and prevent those sensitive content showed up in users' newsfeeds and pages
• Conclusion: Quarantine hate speech allows the user's to have the right to express their emotion and point of view but also protect people from hate speech activity.