Read Case 4.1, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, on pages 92-93.

1. What was missing that the Court indicated was needed in order to find that the mandate was constitutional?
2. Choose what was the purpose of the court's discussion of a healthy diet:
   1. Government has the right to mandate that everyone purchase vegetables.
   2. Government wants to mandate that everyone eat vegetables.
   3. Government can mandate any purchase as long as they can justify it solving a problem.
   4. It is an example of how it would be an overreach of the Government to justify mandating such a purchase.
3. What sources does the court rely on for constitutional interpretation?