1. Read enough of Reference Re Alberta Statutes - The Bank Taxation Act; The Credit of Alberta Regulation Act; and the Accurate News and Information Act, [1938] SCR 100, and Saumur v. City Of Quebec, [1953] 2 S.C.R. 299 and Switzman v. Elbing [1957] SCR 285 to get a sense of what each of these cases is about. (The internet carries some summaries that you may find helpful to your understanding the significance of these cases.) For each case, briefly summarize the fact situation, the legal issue relevant to freedom of speech/the press, the main thrust of the court's reasoning, and the outcome. It can be said that many Canadians are proud that these cases are part of our legal history. Why do you think this is so?