read the ethics case and answer all 3 questions

Ethics Cases orate defendants and Feng in U.S. distri for trademark infringement, T Ethical The defen t.7 Ethics Case BMW North America, corpor LLC, and Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC, in California ed the complaint and summons i dants sent various e-mails to th peared in court or filed an ansWer serv distribute luxury automobiles, automobile parts, and dants were defen lifestyle items in the United States. These companies case. The g the "BMW" and "Roll-Royce" trade- complaint. The court gave the defendants se panies (plaintiffs) discovered that portunities to do so, but no answers were er to several op ever f and their parent and affiliate companies own various but never trademarks bearing marks. These com counterfeit products bearing their being advertised and sold from certain websites. After against the defendants. D further investigation, it was determined that DinoDi- nodirect Corporation, 2012 rect Corporation, a Delaware corporation; DinoDirect (United States District Court for the Northern Distrie China Ltd., a Hong Kong limited liability company; and of California, 2012) B2CForce International Corporation, a California cor poration (corporate defendants) were involved with the 1. When is a default judgment issued? earing erademarks were The court granted the plaintiffs a default ju MW of North An erica U.S. Dist. Lexis 170 production and distribution of these counterfeit items 2. Is the issuance of a default judgment against the de in the United States. Kevin Feng is the president o founder of these corporations. The plaintifis sued the fendants warranted in this case? 3. Did the defendants act ethically in this case