Read the paper Deere K, Williams C, Leary S, et al (2009). Myopia and later physical activity in adolescence: a prospective study.British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43,542-544.

Critically appraise of the statistical material in this paper against items 10, 12-17 of the STROBE checklist. Present your review as a (approx.) report.

-Only review the provided paper Deere et al, 2009. Do not read any other papers. Restrict your review to how well Deere et al have documented their statistical methods - that is, items 10, 12-17 of STROBE only. You may not have to address every item; just describe the major strengths and weaknesses of the authors' descriptions of their statistical methods and results.

link - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26651220_Myopia_and_later_physical_activity_in_adolescence_A_prospective_study

It should look like this.

We critically analyze the paper titled 'T'hysical Activity and Sports Team Participation; Associations with Academic Outcomes in Middle School and High School Students\" by Fox vevt alw {2010) published in Journal of School Health. The basis of critical appraisal is the STROBE'S statement. Item 10 Strength Weakness The demographic prole of the students was For the study two schools 'om Minnesota was well described. The inclusion of all students of only considered. Moreover the survey used the the study was well described. The study data of ProjectEAT. In addition only St Paul consisted of ethnically and W school district and the Minneapolis and ICl|sseo diverse students of Mimlesota. school districts were only considered. Item 12 Strength Weakness The variables used in the study were physical To study the continuous variables [physical activity and academic outcomes. Simple activity and academic outcomes} t-test and regression and t-test is used to analyze the regression analysis are helpful methods. association