Read this recent New York Times article: Why the Baby on Nirvana's 'Nevermind' Album Is Suing Now Links to an external site.. It is the jumping off point for this week's Discussion Board. If you are having trouble accessing the article for any reason, here is a pdf: Why the Baby on Nirvana's 'Nevermind' Album Is Suing Now - The New York Times.pdf Download Why the Baby on Nirvana's 'Nevermind' Album Is Suing Now - The New York Times.pdf For Thursday at midnight, answer these questions: What does the altered picture (with the fishing hook and the dollar bill), the Nirvana album cover, mean/represent? Do you think Nirvana engaged in child pornography when the band used a picture of Spencer Elden naked on the cover of the breakthrough album? Why or why not? Do you think Spencer Elden's lawsuit has merit? Might it win in court? Why or why not? How might Nirvana/the photographer Kirk Weddle who took the picture and Elden's parents have handled the sale of the photograph differently to avoid this situation? What pictures in Chapter Two might fall into this same category i.e. pictures taken without full understanding/consent of the people involved? Why do you think they fall into this category? Indicate page and Figure numbers, as well the title of the photograph and its maker