Recent development in systems (physics) and computational neuroscience present an avenue with which to work through the cross-reference issue. However, it is necessary to elucidate how neurons and neuronal systems might function as complex representations of fundamental units of information, the challenge being to understand how information is represented in neural systems at multiple levels of complexity, from the fundamental properties of proteins up to including the binding problem. Physics encounters an opportunity to utilize neuroscience's methodologies and models for drawing analogous conclusions regarding the unification of elemental laws. Which of the following represent ways in which this process should continue to emerge? (Select all that apply)

a. Quantum physics and classical physics need to address their rift before any advancement can be made with other fields of knowledge. Therefore, neuroscience and physics stand in very different positions in combining their worldview.

b. Translation to physics will be advantageous, if the understanding of information is at both quantum and classical levels, especially if it may contribute to a more unified understanding of the universe by physics.

c. Since the brain and neural models are more accessible to scientists than is the vast universe itself, mathematical innovation in the filed of computational neuroscience may prove applicable to physics and its study may link the discoveries of neuroscience to progress in physics.

d. The discovery of principles that can guide an understanding of how the complexification of information itself occurs, and further, how it is represented at higher levels of a hierarchy.