Recently, the agreement to sell one of Britain's oldest newspapers $-$ Daily Telegraph $-$ to the government of the United Arab Emirates $($via its sovereign wealth fund$)$ was abruptly placed on hold at the request of British lawmakers and regulatory agencies. They claimed that the lucrative commercial deal threatened Britain's national security. Please analyze this conflict from two vantage points $-$ from the point of view of those who arranged this deal and from the point of view of those who are trying to terminate it$.$ What kind of ethical, political, and economic arguments can you provide in defense of the UAE's acquisition? What kind of arguments can you marshal in order to oppose the deal and prevent it$?$ Which point of view appeals to you more and why?