Record your responses from the corresponding test sheet here.Pay careful attention to the numbering, and be precise in your entries.

InstructionsDirections:Solve the following problems and answer the following questions, based upon the following context.Then, record your responses in the corresponding online test.Using appropriate technology is encouraged when appropriate.Pay careful attention to requested levels of precision when reporting answers.

The management at Fitness Fanatics Gym & Health Club has recently proposed four new levels of memberships: bronze, silver, gold and platinum.They surveyed current members in order to anticipate have they might respond to this change in membership plans.The results indicating their preferred level of membership were as follows:

Bronze Silver Gold Platinum

60 40 80 120

The management had previously anticipated that the Bronze and Silver membership levels would each attract half as many members as the Gold and Platinum membership levels.At the 1% level of significance, test the claim that the preferences for membership levels adhered to the anticipated breakdown as the management had initially conjectured.

#11: Compute the entire portion of the test statistic generated by theGoldcolumn.

Answer:

#12: Compute the entire portion of the test statistic generated by thePlatinumcolumn.

Answer:

#13: Compute thetotalvalue of the appropriate test statistic.

Answer:

#14: Compute the correspondingcritical value, rounded to the nearest hundredth if necessary:#.##or##.##

Answer:

#15: Determine the corresponding p-value associated with the test statistic, expressing the answer in decimal form to four decimal places, rounding if appropriate:0.####

Answer:

#16: What is the technical conclusion to this test?

a.response (a): Marginally fail to reject the null hypothesis, based on the available evidence and testing at the 5% level of significance.

b.response (b): Marginally fail to reject the null hypothesis, based on the available evidence and testing at the 1% level of significance.

c.response (c): Fail to reject the null hypothesis, based on the available evidence and testing at the 5% level of significance.

d.response (d): Fail to reject the null hypothesis, based on the available evidence and testing at the 1% level of significance.

e.response (e): Marginally reject the null hypothesis, based on the available evidence and testing at the 5% level of significance.

f.response (f): Marginally reject the null hypothesis, based on the available evidence and testing at the 1% level of significance.

g.response (g): Reject the null hypothesis, based on the available evidence and testing at the 5% level of significance.

h.response (h): Reject the null hypothesis, based on the available evidence and testing at the 1% level of significance.

#17: What is the contextual conclusion to this test?

a.response (a): It is reasonable to claim that current gym members support the proposed new membership plans in proportions presumed by the gym management, based on the available evidence and testing at the 5% level of significance.

b.response (b): It is reasonable to claim that current gym members support the proposed new membership plans in proportions presumed by the gym management, based on the available evidence and testing at the 1% level of significance.

c.response (c): It is reasonable to claim that current gym members support the proposed new membership plans in proportions presumed by the gym management, based on the available evidence and testing at the 5% level of significance.

d.response (d): It is reasonable to claim that current gym members support the proposed new membership plans in proportions presumed by the gym management, based on the available evidence and testing at the 1% level of significance.

e.response (e): It is marginally unreasonable to claim that current gym members support the proposed new membership plans in proportions presumed by the gym management, based on the available evidence and testing at the 5% level of significance.

f.response (f): It is marginally unreasonable to claim that current gym members support the proposed new membership plans in proportions presumed by the gym management, based on the available evidence and testing at the 1% level of significance.

g.response (g): It is unreasonable to claim that current gym members support the proposed new membership plans in proportions presumed by the gym management, based on the available evidence and testing at the 5% level of significance.

h.response (h): It is unreasonable to claim that current gym members support the proposed new membership plans in proportions presumed by the gym management, based on the available evidence and testing at the 1% level of significance.