Question
Redwood Inc, which owned a parcel of land that con- tained dense forests, entered into a contract with Bunyon Corp. Bunyon was required to cut
Redwood Inc, which owned a parcel of land that con- tained dense forests, entered into a contract with Bunyon Corp. Bunyon was required to cut and remove the trees from a 40-hectare area. In exchange, Redwood was required to pay $150 000 and provide trucks to Bunyon to transport the cut logs from the work site. After Bunyon had cleared about 20 hectares, Redwood breached a condition of the contract by failing to provide a sufficient number of trucks. Bunyon therefore discharged the contract for breach and claimed damages. At trial, the evidence indicated that Bunyon had entered into a bad bargain. It had cleared about half of the designated area and had received $75 000 in payment from Redwood. In doing so, however, Bunyon had actually incurred $300 000 in expenses. That amount represented the true market value of the services rendered and was not at all attributable to incompetence or mismanagement. If Bunyon claims expectation damages, what amount of money should it receive? If Bunyon claims reliance damages, what amount of money should it receive? Is there any other basis upon which Bunyon could claim relief? If so, what amount of money would it receive?
in irac format wth explanation and remedy
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started