Refer back to the Wrench, L.L.C. case in your Kubasek text (Case 13-2) and the "Additional Materials" folder in this module and address the following in your post and response posts: "Ultimately, Wrench LLC was awarded $30.1 million from Taco Bell, that outcome was not a foregone conclusion and it took five years of litigation for the case to finally be over." How do you think Wrench should alter its behavior in the future to try not to get in a similar situation in the future? What could Taco Bell have done (or not done) to have prevented this case from arising? Which stakeholders' interests are helped by this decision? Which stakeholders' interests are harmed? Refer back to the Wrench, L.L.C. case in your Kubasek text (Case 13-2) and the "Additional Materials" folder in this module and address the following in your post and response posts: "Ultimately, Wrench LLC was awarded $30.1 million from Taco Bell, that outcome was not a foregone conclusion and it took five years of litigation for the case to finally be over." How do you think Wrench should alter its behavior in the future to try not to get in a similar situation in the future? What could Taco Bell have done (or not done) to have prevented this case from arising? Which stakeholders' interests are helped by this decision? Which stakeholders' interests are harmed