Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Refer to the cash flows, discuss the reasons why project should consider for investing? often sourced the equipment for production and assembly from a vendor

Refer to the cash flows, discuss the reasons why project should consider for investing?

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

often sourced the equipment for production and assembly from a vendor in Germany. Due to the superb business relationship, the vendor had agreed to provide seller financing up to 90 percent of the equipment cost at a very attractive interest rate of two percent per annum. This rate was much lower than what Jason could borrow from a German bank, a U.S. bank, or a Brazilian bank. The bank rates comparison was as follows: Loan Rates Secured by the Equipment and 3P Turbo's U.S. Assets German Vendor German Bank U.S. Bank Brazilian Bank 6% 8% 15% 2% The seller financing agreement required 3P Turbo to completely pay off the loan, both principal and interest, over five equal installments in Euros as outlined here: Calculation of Loan Payments Based on 2% Annual Rate Loan Amount R$90 million or Euro 22.5 million Spot Exchange Rates 4.00 R$/Euro 3.56 R$/USD Forward Exchange Rate 4.20 R$/Euro 3.74 R$/USD in Currency Swap) Vendor Loan Rate 2% 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Loan Payments (Euro) 4.773,564 4.773.564 4.773.564 4.773,564 4.773.564 With R$90 million of seller financing, the debt to equity ratio of the capital expenditure was 3:1. This was a concern as 3P Turbo liked to maintain a much lower debt equity ratio for the company, typically about 1:1. Unless 3P Turbo changed its desired debt equity ratio at the corporate level, future projects would need to be financed with very little debt. Similar to previous investments, site preparation and equipment costs were treated as capital expenditures depreciable over five years on a straight-line basis. Training costs were expensed off in the same year the expenses were incurred. Due to equipment becoming worn and technologically obsolete, the consultant estimated a salvage value for the site and equipment of R$30 million at the end of the fifth year. Like any sizable entity doing business in Brazil, 3P Turbo would be subject to a total tax rate of approximately 34 percent on the profits made each year." While the tax rate on corporate profits remained unchanged over the last ten years, the capital gains tax rate had just been increased from its previous flat rate of 15 percent and 25 percent for entities from non-tax-haven and tax-haven countries, respectively. Starting January 1, 2016, the Brazilian government imposed a tiered capital gains tax rate on all individuals and entities, domestic or foreign, based on the following: Capital Gains Tax Rate in Brazil for All Individuals and Legal Entities Tax Rate Capital Gains Amount 15% Up to R$1,000,000 20% > R$1,000,000 and R$5.000.000 and R$20,000,000 While the Brazilian real (R$) cash flows numbers looked promising, the risks of investing in Brazil had to be properly accounted for to determine if the investment would create value. The cost of capital of 10 percent used for similar projects in the U.S. would be inappropriate for this investment. Brazil had a much higher inflation rate than the U.S. and the trend was expected to continue. The RS revenues and costs reflected a 9 percent inflation rate every year for the next five years. In contrast, the U.S. inflation rate forecast was at 2 percent per year during the same period. 2016 2017 38 44 50 5 year case return Projected Volume (000) Price per unit (R$) Production cost per unit (R$) Selling cost per unit (R$) Administrative cost per unit (R$) Reverwe Production cost per unit (R$) Gross Profit seting cost Administrative cost Depreciation BIT Taxes on Profits (34%) After-Tax Profit Add back depreciation Total operating cash flows 2400 1050 300 100 67200 29400 378 8400 2018 2019 2020 2021 30 2616 2851.4 3108.1 3387.8 1144.5 1247.5 1359.8 1482.21 327 356.4 388.5 423.5 1090 118.8 129.5 141.21 78480 108355 136/55 169390 -34335 47405 -59830 -74108 44145 6095076925 95282 -9810 -13544 -17094 -21174 -3270 4515 5698 -7158 -24000 -24000 -24000 - 24000 7065 18990 30132 43650 -2402 6423 10245 -14637 466312468 1983728413 24000 24000 24000 24000 28663 36468 43887 52413 2800 -24000 2600 894 1716 24000 25716 -12FEFD Cost of building and equipment Cost of training after tax 6600 salvage value 30000 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017 4773564 Euro 18000010 Loan payment 4773564 4773564 4773564 4773564 Loan Amount 1800DD.CO 1800DD.CO 180.000 DO 180.00DDD 22500000 Euro 90000000 $ Inflation rate 109 often sourced the equipment for production and assembly from a vendor in Germany. Due to the superb business relationship, the vendor had agreed to provide seller financing up to 90 percent of the equipment cost at a very attractive interest rate of two percent per annum. This rate was much lower than what Jason could borrow from a German bank, a U.S. bank, or a Brazilian bank. The bank rates comparison was as follows: Loan Rates Secured by the Equipment and 3P Turbo's U.S. Assets German Vendor German Bank U.S. Bank Brazilian Bank 6% 8% 15% 2% The seller financing agreement required 3P Turbo to completely pay off the loan, both principal and interest, over five equal installments in Euros as outlined here: Calculation of Loan Payments Based on 2% Annual Rate Loan Amount R$90 million or Euro 22.5 million Spot Exchange Rates 4.00 R$/Euro 3.56 R$/USD Forward Exchange Rate 4.20 R$/Euro 3.74 R$/USD in Currency Swap) Vendor Loan Rate 2% 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Loan Payments (Euro) 4.773,564 4.773.564 4.773.564 4.773,564 4.773.564 With R$90 million of seller financing, the debt to equity ratio of the capital expenditure was 3:1. This was a concern as 3P Turbo liked to maintain a much lower debt equity ratio for the company, typically about 1:1. Unless 3P Turbo changed its desired debt equity ratio at the corporate level, future projects would need to be financed with very little debt. Similar to previous investments, site preparation and equipment costs were treated as capital expenditures depreciable over five years on a straight-line basis. Training costs were expensed off in the same year the expenses were incurred. Due to equipment becoming worn and technologically obsolete, the consultant estimated a salvage value for the site and equipment of R$30 million at the end of the fifth year. Like any sizable entity doing business in Brazil, 3P Turbo would be subject to a total tax rate of approximately 34 percent on the profits made each year." While the tax rate on corporate profits remained unchanged over the last ten years, the capital gains tax rate had just been increased from its previous flat rate of 15 percent and 25 percent for entities from non-tax-haven and tax-haven countries, respectively. Starting January 1, 2016, the Brazilian government imposed a tiered capital gains tax rate on all individuals and entities, domestic or foreign, based on the following: Capital Gains Tax Rate in Brazil for All Individuals and Legal Entities Tax Rate Capital Gains Amount 15% Up to R$1,000,000 20% > R$1,000,000 and R$5.000.000 and R$20,000,000 While the Brazilian real (R$) cash flows numbers looked promising, the risks of investing in Brazil had to be properly accounted for to determine if the investment would create value. The cost of capital of 10 percent used for similar projects in the U.S. would be inappropriate for this investment. Brazil had a much higher inflation rate than the U.S. and the trend was expected to continue. The RS revenues and costs reflected a 9 percent inflation rate every year for the next five years. In contrast, the U.S. inflation rate forecast was at 2 percent per year during the same period. 2016 2017 38 44 50 5 year case return Projected Volume (000) Price per unit (R$) Production cost per unit (R$) Selling cost per unit (R$) Administrative cost per unit (R$) Reverwe Production cost per unit (R$) Gross Profit seting cost Administrative cost Depreciation BIT Taxes on Profits (34%) After-Tax Profit Add back depreciation Total operating cash flows 2400 1050 300 100 67200 29400 378 8400 2018 2019 2020 2021 30 2616 2851.4 3108.1 3387.8 1144.5 1247.5 1359.8 1482.21 327 356.4 388.5 423.5 1090 118.8 129.5 141.21 78480 108355 136/55 169390 -34335 47405 -59830 -74108 44145 6095076925 95282 -9810 -13544 -17094 -21174 -3270 4515 5698 -7158 -24000 -24000 -24000 - 24000 7065 18990 30132 43650 -2402 6423 10245 -14637 466312468 1983728413 24000 24000 24000 24000 28663 36468 43887 52413 2800 -24000 2600 894 1716 24000 25716 -12FEFD Cost of building and equipment Cost of training after tax 6600 salvage value 30000 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017 4773564 Euro 18000010 Loan payment 4773564 4773564 4773564 4773564 Loan Amount 1800DD.CO 1800DD.CO 180.000 DO 180.00DDD 22500000 Euro 90000000 $ Inflation rate 109

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Intermediate Accounting principles and analysis

Authors: Terry d. Warfield, jerry j. weygandt, Donald e. kieso

2nd Edition

471737933, 978-0471737933

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions