Refer to the LawNow article, "Disabilities and Addiction in the Workplace" written by Myrna El Fakhry Tuttle. Tuttle makes reference to the Supreme Court decision in Stewart v Elk Valley Coal Corp., 2017 SCC 30. According to the article, which of the following statements is FALSE? Select one: a. To make a case of prima facie discrimination, complainants are required to show that they have a characteristic protected from discrimination; that they experienced an adverse impact with respect to the service; and that the protected characteristic was a factor in the adverse impact. b. The employer implemented the Alcohol, Illegal Drugs & Medications Policy, aimed at ensuring safety in the mine. Employees were expected to disclose any dependence or addiction issues before any drug-related incident occurred. If they did, they would be offered treatment. c. The Alberta Human Rights Tribunal found that Mr. Stewart established a case of prima facie discrimination. d. Mr. Stewart, through his union representative, argued that he was terminated for addiction and that this constituted discrimination under section 7(1) of the Alberta Human Rights, Citizenship and Multiculturalism Act (now Alberta Human Rights Act).