Regarding Astrology being a science, what is atleast one threat to internal or external validity or reliability? Why is this threat problematic and how could it be remedied? Consider which validity threats are most common. Which are the most difficult to deal with?

REFERENCES

Allum, N. (2011). What Makes Some People Think Astrology Is Scientific? Science Communication, 33(3), 341-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547010389819

Chico, E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2006). Belief in Astrology Inventory: Development and validation. Psychological Reports, 99(3), 851-863. https://doi-org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.2466/PR0.99.7.851-863

Komath, Manoj. (2009). Testing astrology. Current Science. 96. 1568-1572,

MAYER, G. (2020). Astrology and Science: A Precarious Relationship Part 2: Consideration of Empirical Investigations on the Validity of Astrology. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 34(4), 792-828. https://doi-org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.31275/20201697

Pigliucci, M., & Boudry, M. (2014). Prove it! The burden of proof game in science vs. pseudoscience disputes. Philosophia, 42, 487-502.