Remedies dont interest me but here give you indication of the breadth of discretion hat court has in solving the problem. First of all, he used to be employed as a senior stamp consultant, with a salary of 2500 pound which in 1950? it was awful amount of money . He wasn't allowed to interfere in the running of a company but he was appointed to president for life so was title president for life but no powers. And the others to had to buy his shares. Company had to buy his shares. Just and inequitable. This is what the court thought that we can gobble these power and this is what we think as a fair solution. Very broad remedy provided there